GrantedDecided 24 February 2022Limerick County Council

Bishop's Quay, Lower Cecil Street & Henry Street, Limerick

Planning application 217048
DecisionConditional grant
Decided24 February 2022
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Extension of duration for 20/195 for revisions to the development permitted under Planning Register Reference Number 16/800; An Bord Pleanala Reference PL91.247888 ('the parent permission') comprising the resumption of office use at No.104 Henry Street, known as 'The Bishop's Palace', in lieu of the provision of 7 no. apartments approved in the 'parent permission'; revisions to the metal clad roof extension to the south-east and north-east elevation of The Bishop's Palace as specified in Condition no.2(a) of the parent permission; revised landscape plan to the public plaza to the front of the Bishop's Palace as specified in Condition no.2(d) of the parent permission; ancillary site development works, including refurbishment and restoration of the building all on a site of 0.4ha approx.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bishop's Quay, Lower Cecil Street & Henry Street, Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →