GrantedDecided 29 September 2022Limerick County Council

Camas, Monagea, Newcastle West Co. Limerick

Planning application 22123
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 September 2022
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
And completion of the dairy and cubicle unit (building reference SF04) and permission for the retention of the reinforced concrete silage slab and dungstead (building reference SF08), planning permission to construct (A) calf rearing and housing unit (building reference SF06), (B) fertiliser, feedstuff and machinery store (building reference SF 07), (C) cubicle unit (building reference SF05), permission to construct a boundary wall 2.1m high adjacent to roadway with gated entrance as shown on drawings all with associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Camas, Monagea, Newcastle West Co. Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →