RefusedDecided 16 September 2022Limerick County Council

Eir Exchange Corgrig, Dernish Avenue Foynes, Co. Limerick

Planning application 22810
DecisionRefused
Decided16 September 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Replacement of no. 3 12m high timber poles with an 18m high telecommunications monopole together with antennas, dishes and associated telecommunications equipment, all enclosed in timber fencing

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-314847-22Submitted 13 October 2022 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-314847-22
    13 October 2022
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eir Exchange Corgrig, Dernish Avenue Foynes, Co. Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →