GrantedDecided 12 October 2022Limerick County Council

Cullinagh, Newcastle West, Co. Limerick.

Planning application 22920
DecisionConditional grant
Decided12 October 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Carry out works at the front. side and rear of an existing dwellinghouse. The proposed works are to include: (i) Alteration and extension of existing entrance door and two bay windows to front of aforesaid dwellinghouse (ii) Construction of a new extension to the side and rear of aforesaid dwellinghouse (iii) Conversion and extension of existing garage/boiler house/storage building to extend existing living accommodation (iv) Replace existing pitched slate roof of said garage/boiler house/storage building with a flat roof Together with all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cullinagh, Newcastle West, Co. Limerick.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →