GrantedDecided 17 July 2024Limerick County Council

Regeneron Ireland DAC, Ballycummin, Raheen Business Park

Planning application 24220
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 July 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Development that includes; (a) Erection of a new palisade fence behind the existing hedgerow to the southern boundary of the Regeneron site, adjacent to Loughmore Avenue and to neighbouring sites. The fence perimeter length is approximately 680 metres and it is approximately 3 metres high. (b) Provision of an access point with gates within the new fence aligning with the existing access point from Loughmore Avenue. (c) Temporary works to include set down of construction materials, access for construction traffic, temporary site lighting and all associated siteworks for the erection of said fence. This application consists of development on landholding for which a licence under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as amended by the Protection of the Environment Act, 2003) is required

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Regeneron Ireland DAC, Ballycummin, Raheen Business Park?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →