RefusedDecided 21 June 2024Limerick County Council

Superoil Service Station, Dromsally Road, Cappamore

Planning application 2460394
DecisionRefused
Decided21 June 2024
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
A period of 3 years for the extended shop, sheds on western boundary, shed and toilet block on eastern boundary, skip yard, car wash, totem pole all within the revised site boundaries. The unauthorised works that are the subject of Enforcement Notice DC-181-21. Planning Permission for the demolition of the existing service station and for the construction of a new service station which will include: Construction of a new forecourt canopy, A retail shop, A deli, coffee area and kitchen, Stores and freezer rooms, Service room, Manager and accounts offices, Meeting room, Customer and staff toilets, Staff canteen, Electric Vehicle charging points, Air and water service area, Carwash, Vehicle parking signage and all associated works. One Service Station - 2 stories in height - Maximum height - 6.3 meters

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Superoil Service Station, Dromsally Road, Cappamore?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →