GrantedDecided 16 June 2026Limerick County Council

Caherelly Grange, Kilmallock, Co. Limerick

Planning application 2660237
DecisionConditional grant
Decided16 June 2026
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Minor external alterations and modifications to previously permitted dwelling (Ref. 13/53), including: (a) Relocation and installation of Velux Roof Windows, (b) Replacement of sections of approved natural stone finish with plaster finish to selected elevations, (c) Retention of domestic shed as constructed, (d) Retention of attached open-sided timber pergola structure located within the inner corner of the L-shaped dwelling, (e) Retention of entrance arrangement as constructed, (f) Relocation of approved percolation area, (g) All associated site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Caherelly Grange, Kilmallock, Co. Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →