GrantedDecided 19 November 2018Longford County Council

St. Johnstown Td., Ballinalee, Co. Longford.

Planning application 18176
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 November 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Longford County Council.
(1) construct 4 No. OAP single storey houses, consisting of 2 semi-detached units. (2) Close existing right of way into neighbouring lands, with provision for a new right of way via the proposed entrance to OAPs houses (3) Permission is also sought for associated new entrance, footpaths, roadway, boundary fencing and walling, connection to adjoining utility services and all ancillary site works. Significant further information has been furnished to the planning authority. The significant further information consists of, revised site layout along with relocation of the boundaries of the site, resulting in the requirement of point 2 above, to close existing right of way into neighbouring lands, with provision for a new right of way via the proposed entrance to OAP's houses, being now no longer required

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Longford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near St. Johnstown Td., Ballinalee, Co. Longford.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →