RefusedDecided 16 June 2017Louth County Council

13 Rampark Shore, Rampark Td, Jenkinstown

Planning application 17314
DecisionRefused
Decided16 June 2017
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention and permission for develoment to consist of permission for retention of an existing balcony and glass enclosure structure and permission for a new 1.7m high privacy screen comprising opaque glass within a stainless steel frame on the western side of the balcony to match materials and finishes to the existing balcony enclosure. The balcony area has dimensions of 1.1m by 2.9m to give an overall area of 3.19sq.m and is formed by the flat-roof area of a porch permitted as part of planning ref. 15/722. The balcony serves an existing dwellinghouse.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL 15.248869Submitted 13 July 2017 / decided 15 November 2017
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 13 Rampark Shore, Rampark Td, Jenkinstown?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →