GrantedDecided 14 June 2018Louth County Council

Former Tom Fox Car Showroom site, New Grange Business Park, Donore Road

Planning application 18320
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 June 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission for an extension at (Former Tom Fox) car showroom site. The development consists of extensions to the south and east elevations to form additional workshop area and car valeting/wash facilites, (combined addition of 243.7m2 floor area), with associated internal reconfiguration. External customer parking layout and used display areas to be reconfigured. Elevations to receive new external cladding, and corporate signage consisting; 1 brand pylon, 1 directional pylon and 4 fascia signs.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Former Tom Fox Car Showroom site, New Grange Business Park, Donore Road?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →