RefusedDecided 07 August 2020Louth County Council

The Neptune Public House, Main Street, Blackrock

Planning application 191013
DecisionRefused
Decided07 August 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention of a white canopy structure, bar and metal clad roof structure over existing beer garden and metal clad awning to existing smoking area at the rear

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP 308077-20Submitted 01 September 2020 / decided 13 January 2021
Status not recordedREFUSED
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP 308077-20
    01 September 2020
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSED
    13 January 2021
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Neptune Public House, Main Street, Blackrock?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →