GrantedDecided 25 September 2020Louth County Council

Ard Easmuinn, Ecco Road, Demesne

Planning application 191069
DecisionConditional grant
Decided25 September 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission for 1. Demolition of shed on site. 2. Two blocks of apartments, one block consisting of 3 storey 15 number 2 bedroom apartments, one block consisting of 3 storey 12 number 2 bedroom apartments. 3. Six number 3 storey semi-detached 4 bedroom dwellings. 4. Three number 2 storey terraced 3 bed room dwellings. 36 units in total. Diverting public sewer on site, connecting to town sewer and off new entrance and all associated site works **Significant Further Information received 31/08/2020 provided for, inter alia, an additional 9 units ie total units is 45**

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ard Easmuinn, Ecco Road, Demesne?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →