GrantedDecided 24 July 2020Louth County Council

No. 1 & No. 2 Lower Main Street, Sea Road, Blackrock Dundalk

Planning application 20392
DecisionConditional grant
Decided24 July 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention permission for the unauthorised amendments made to the development granted under planning ref. 19/20 consisting of retention of existing chimneys, a reduction in the floor area of the extension to house no. 2 from 49m2 to 42m2, an increase to the roof height of the extension, the repositioning of Velux roof lights, the omission of solar panels, elevational changes to the northeast side, southwest side and northwest rear, alterations to the surface water drainage system, alterations to the site boundary treatments and site entrances

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No. 1 & No. 2 Lower Main Street, Sea Road, Blackrock Dundalk?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →