RefusedDecided 11 June 2021Louth County Council

4 Feheen Valley, Strand Road, Termonfeckin Co Louth

Planning application 20862
DecisionRefused
Decided11 June 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission for a development that will comprise of the following (i) construction of new garage along southern boundary of property; (ii) erection of new timber fence along northern boundary (iii)construction of extension to bridge to provide new walls and piers; (iv) construction of new boundary walls along bridge; (v) provision of gabions along river banks to provide erosion protection; (vi) landscaping works along the river between gabions and boundary treatments, (vii) all associated ancillary works necessary to facilitate the development. A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) accompanies this application. *Significant Further Information received on 19/04/2021 which includes the removal of the proposed garage from plans; a Natura Impact Statement, engineering reports, construction environmental plan and flood risk assessment*

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 4 Feheen Valley, Strand Road, Termonfeckin Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →