GrantedDecided 22 January 2021Louth County Council

Carrickrobin, Kilkerley, Dundalk Co Louth

Planning application 20995
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 January 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention & Permission: Permission to construct a single storey extension to side of existing house, construct an external chimney breast with section of wall on either side enclosing associated new patio area, hardwood pergola covering section of patio, new set of sliding patio doors to side of house and to rear of house, alterations to rear windows at ground floor level and all associated site works. Retention of an unauthorised existing window/roof arrangement of existing 3 no. dormer windows at front of house and retention of velux window to rear of existing house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Carrickrobin, Kilkerley, Dundalk Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →