GrantedDecided 23 July 2021Louth County Council

Glydefarm, Tallanstown, Co Louth

Planning application 21696
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 July 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention Permission that will consist of (1) a single storey garage structure to the side/rear garden, (2) the conversion of a single storey garage structure to habitable living space to the front/side and Planning Permission for the construction of (1) a new single storey dormer extension to the front/side, with velux rooflights to the south at roof level, a side gable end window to the east at dormer level, and a flat roof dormer structure to the north elevation at roof level, (2) a new gable end window serving an existing bedroom at dormer attic level to the side/west

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Glydefarm, Tallanstown, Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →