GrantedDecided 10 June 2022Louth County Council

Benmore, 47 George's Street, Drogheda Co Louth

Planning application 2260
DecisionConditional grant
Decided10 June 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission for 1. The construction of a two storey building comprising 6 no. residential units consisting of 4 no. one bed and 2 no. two bed apartments to the rear of the site. 2. Removal of existing trees to the site and its boundaries. 3. Repair, re-render and painting of existing rear boundary wall. 4. Repair of existing stone boundary wall to adjacent property which is a protected structure. 5. All associated site services, drainage, lighting and landscaping to be carried out in conjunction with works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP 313969-22Submitted 01 July 2022 / decided 19 December 2023
Status not recordedMODIFIED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Benmore, 47 George's Street, Drogheda Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →