GrantedDecided 22 February 2024Louth County Council

Earl Street, Dundalk, Co Louth

Planning application 2360553
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 February 2024
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention and completion of a development consisting of the change of use of ancillary storage area at the former Amber Night Club to facilitate the addition of 1no apartment, to the 6no. previously granted under Planning Ref No.s 20/156 & 22/984 at the former Amber Night Club. Retention of alterations to original windows on the eastern alleyway elevation. The building forms part of a protected structure under the current Louth County Development Plan - Record of Protected Structure Ref No. D192. Note, no alterations to the listed/protected façade is proposed or envisioned

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Earl Street, Dundalk, Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →