RefusedDecided 27 June 2024Louth County Council

Norhalton, Raynoldstown Village Haynestown, Dublin Road Dundalk Co. Louth

Planning application 2460260
DecisionRefused
Decided27 June 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission for the (a) changes to layout and house types on site numbers 20 & 21 and 30 to 37 inclusive (10 No. houses) approved under Planning Permission Reg. Ref.: 22 / 688 to 14 No. houses comprising the following: 5 No. 3 bedroom 2 storey end of terrace and semi-detached Type C2, 5 No. 3 bedroom 2 storey end of terrace and semi-detached Type C3, 3 No. 2 bedroom 2 storey mid-terrace Type H and 1 No. 4 bedroom 2 storey detached Type M, and (b) changes to elevational treatment and roof profile of house No’s 1 & 2 and 24-29 inclusive, approved under Planning Permission Reg. Ref.: 22/583 to match the materials and finishes approved under Reg. Ref.: 22 /688 compliance condition 9 ( a ) and ( b), all on approved sites 1 & 2, 20 & 21 and 24-37 inclusive, “Norhalton” Raynoldstown Village

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Norhalton, Raynoldstown Village Haynestown, Dublin Road Dundalk Co. Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →