GrantedDecided 14 March 2025Louth County Council

51 Woodland Drive, Ard Easmuinn, Dundalk County Louth

Planning application 2460540
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 March 2025
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention permission for the following works: (a) The demolition of existing bungalow during construction stage and (b) Alterations to previously approved floor plans and elevations and all ancillary and associated works. Previous planning reference 22797 relates to this site *Significant Further Information received on 20/02/2025 - Retention Planning Permission for the following works: (a) The demolition of existing bungalow during construction stage and (b) Retention of the replacement two storey dwelling and all ancillary and associated works*

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 51 Woodland Drive, Ard Easmuinn, Dundalk County Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →