GrantedDecided 27 June 2025Louth County Council

Bridgegate, Rathgory & Mulladrillen, Drogheda Road

Planning application 2560
DecisionConditional grant
Decided27 June 2025
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Extension of duration for planning reference 19/336. Construction of a total 65 no. residential houses (replacing the previously permitted dwellings at the location); comprising of the following; 18 no. 2 bed terrace two storey dwellings (Type 10;23 no.3 bed detached and semi detached two storey dwellings (type 2); 12 no.3 bed detached and semi detached two storey dwellings(Type 3); 4 no. 4 bed semi-detached two storey (Type 4); 2 no 4 detached two storey dwellings (Type 5); 6 no. 3 bed semi detached two storey dwellings (Type 6).

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bridgegate, Rathgory & Mulladrillen, Drogheda Road?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →