GrantedDecided 13 February 2026Louth County Council

Eir Exchange, Dundalk Road Drumnasillagh Td, Ravensdale Co. Louth.

Planning application 2560307
DecisionConditional grant
Decided13 February 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission to erect a 24 metre lattice support structure carrying telecommunications equipment including antennas, dishes, and associated equipment (comprising a total height of 25.5 metres including attached lightning finials), together with new ground level equipment cabinets and fencing. On completion of the above the two existing 10 metre high wooden poles each with a 3 metre high antenna attached (comprising a total height of 13 metres each) will be removed

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL-500939-LH-26Submitted 09 March 2026 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eir Exchange, Dundalk Road Drumnasillagh Td, Ravensdale Co. Louth.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →