RefusedDecided 01 May 2026Louth County Council

Grange, Knockbridge, Dundalk Co. Louth

Planning application 2560811
DecisionRefused
Decided01 May 2026
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention and Permission for the following: a) Retention permission for a machinery shed. b) Planning permission for the demolition of existing silage pits. c) Planning permission for the construction of a cubicle shed with underground slatted storage tanks in place of the old silage pits. d) Planning permission for the construction of new silage pits and an underground effluent storage tank. e) Planning permission for the extension of existing yard consisting of collecting yard and handling facilities, underground slatted soiled water storage tank and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Grange, Knockbridge, Dundalk Co. Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →