GrantedDecided 27 October 2023Mayo County Council

Tullycommons, Castlebar, Co. Mayo

Planning application 23517
DecisionConditional grant
Decided27 October 2023
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Mayo County Council.
Retain revised elevation of doors/windows fenestration of existing house and extension thereto planning permissions reference no. P98/2402 and P05/306 and the addition of a velux window to the north elevation of existing house. Convert attic storeroom to bedroom in the extension granted under P05/306. Retain the following structures: building 1 referred to in drawings being submitted as Playroom, building 2 referred to in drawings being submitted as a grage/shed, stables and store and access thereto, building 3 referred to in drawings being submitted as a turf/timber fuel store and hen house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Mayo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Tullycommons, Castlebar, Co. Mayo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →