GrantedDecided 16 October 2023Mayo County Council

Sunrise View B & B Ballinlena, Carrowmore-Lacken., Ballina Co. Mayo

Planning application 2360248
DecisionConditional grant
Decided16 October 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Mayo County Council.
Full planning permission for the following; (1) Close up existing entrance to the southwest corner of the site, with new replacement entrance to the front boundary, (2) 5.no self-contained glamping pods with on-site services, (3) Installation of 300sqm of free standing solar panels, including plant room,(4) On-site waste water treatment unit, (5) Proposed reception area within existing building and (6) all associated site works at Ballinlena, Carrowmore-Lacken, Ballina, Co. Mayo.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
318430-23Submitted 09 November 2023 / decided 27 June 2024
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Mayo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Sunrise View B & B Ballinlena, Carrowmore-Lacken., Ballina Co. Mayo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →