GrantedDecided 28 February 2024Mayo County Council

Ashleam, Dooega, Achill. County Mayp

Planning application 2360374
DecisionConditional grant
Decided28 February 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Mayo County Council.
PERMISSION TO (1) RENOVATE AND REFURBISH EXISTING COTTAGE AND CARRY OUT ALTERATION TO SAME INCLUDING THE (A) PROVISION NEW REPLACEMENT ROOF (B) RECONSTRUCTION OF ROADSIDE GABLE WALL (C) REVISED WINDOW OPENINGS (D) PROVISION OF A NEW PITCH ROOF OVER EXISTING FLAT ROOF REAR EXTENSION (2) CONSTRUCT A NEW PITCH ROOF REAR EXTENSION (3) REPLACE EXISTING FRONT FLAT ROOF EXTENSION WITH A NEW PITCH ROOF EXTENSION AND (4) CONSTRUCT A NEW REPLACEMENT SEPTIC TANK, PROPRIETARY EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEM AND SOIL POLISHING FILTER TANK INCLUDING ALL ASSOCIATED SITE DEVELOPMENT WORKS

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Mayo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ashleam, Dooega, Achill. County Mayp?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →