GrantedDecided 29 October 2025Mayo County Council

Horkans Garden Centre Turlough Rd, Turlough (Turlach) TD. and Knockanour TD., Castlebar Co. Mayo.

Planning application 2560364
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 October 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Mayo County Council.
Planning permission for the installation of a proposed foul water pumping station, rising main, and all other associated site development works above and below ground level and all other development works as set out in the planning application documentation. All services connections are to existing services on the public road. All of the above is proposed at Horkans Garden Centre, Turlough Rd, Turlough (Turlach) TD. and Knockanour TD., Castlebar, Co. Mayo.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Mayo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Horkans Garden Centre Turlough Rd, Turlough (Turlach) TD. and Knockanour TD., Castlebar Co. Mayo.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →