GrantedDecided 22 April 2026Mayo County Council

Cornamarrow Frenchill, Castlebar, Co. Mayo

Planning application 2660153
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 April 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Mayo County Council.
Planning Permission for Development consisting of removal of an existing agricultural shed and construction of a new machinery shed and new slatted shed over an existing underground slurry storage tank along with all associated site works. There will be two buildings constructed and all effluent will be collected and stored in the existing slatted tanks. The proposed machinery shed will be 6.375m in height and the proposed slatted shed will be 6.712m in height and is to be constructed in an existing farmyard our clients family have been farming for years.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Mayo has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cornamarrow Frenchill, Castlebar, Co. Mayo?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →