RefusedDecided 28 July 2021Meath County Council

Yellowshar, Kilmoon, Ashbourne Co. Meath

Planning application 211068
DecisionRefused
Decided28 July 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The retention of an industrial facility including a storage/workshop authorised under grant of permission for Planning Register Reference No. P81/319; 3no. buildings used as storage/workshops; a structure used for covered open storage; ancillary officers; staff rooms (5 no.); external storage areas; car parking facilities and related site development works and for the installation of proprietary waste water treatment plant and soil polishing filter and a new surface water drainage system, including an attenuation tank

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-311216-21Submitted 24 August 2021 / decided 05 September 2022
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Yellowshar, Kilmoon, Ashbourne Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →