GrantedDecided 06 September 2021Meath County Council

Clonmagaddan, Kingscourt Road, Navan Co Meath

Planning application 211362
DecisionUnconditional grant
Decided06 September 2021
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
EXTENSION OF DURATION OF PLANNING PERMISSION NA/160649/PL17.247211 - the development consists of to demolish existing habitable single storey type dwelling and (1) to construct 11 no. two storey type houses with living accommodation provided to third floor attic space comprising of: 1 no. detached house type A, 8 no. semi-detached house type B and 2 no. semi-detached house type C. (2) Provide accesses onto existing public road via internal service road. (3) Connect to existing services and (4) complete all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Clonmagaddan, Kingscourt Road, Navan Co Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →