GrantedDecided 14 January 2022Meath County Council

Maudlin Friarspark 2nd Division and Iffernock, Trim, Co Meath (area now known as Effernock)

Planning application 212161
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 January 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The proposed development relates to the southwestern part of the permitted development site only. The development consists of (1) site boundary alterations (2) a change of House Type 'E3' (detached single storey 2 bedroom dwelling) to House Type 'E4' (also a detached single storey 2 bedroom dwelling (3) repositioning of 13 no. dwellings at 37-49 "Effernock Green" and all ancillary site works. As such, there will be no change to the overall number of dwellings currently permitted on the site

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Maudlin Friarspark 2nd Division and Iffernock, Trim, Co Meath (area now known as Effernock)?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →