GrantedDecided 03 October 2022Meath County Council

Lagore Road, Lagore Big, Dunshaughlin Co. Meath A85 EC86

Planning application 221052
DecisionConditional grant
Decided03 October 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The demolition of an existing 60Sq. Mt single storey outbuilding and the construction of a replacement single storey building divided into 3 sections (1) A secure storage area for Bicycles and Sporting Equipment, measuring 19.13 Sq. Mts. (2) A secure storage area for DIY Tools, Household Items and Garden Furniture, measuring 38.5 Sq. Mts. (3) A Grow and Potting area, measuring 39.95 Sq. Mts, with a combined floor area of 97.6 Sq. Mt's. The above works will also incorporate an above ground 1600-liter rain harvesting system

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Lagore Road, Lagore Big, Dunshaughlin Co. Meath A85 EC86?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →