GrantedDecided 16 November 2023Meath County Council

Milltown & Foxtown, Kiltale, Co. Meath

Planning application 23932
DecisionUnconditional grant
Decided16 November 2023
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
EXTENSION OF DURATION OF PLANNING PERMISSION TA181083 - the recontouring of agricultural land and associated site works using imported clean inert soil and stones within a farm holding of 3.821 hectares within the townland of Milltown (plus the additional access roadway serving the development of 0.553 hectares in the townland of Foxtown) for the consequential benefit to agriculture. A 5 year planning permission is requested and during this period 95,619 tonnes of inert soil and stones will be imported for the purposes of land reclamation

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Milltown & Foxtown, Kiltale, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →