GrantedDecided 18 April 2024Meath County Council

Headfort Arms Hotel, Headfort Place, Kells

Planning application 2460152
DecisionConditional grant
Decided18 April 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
I Vincent Duff, intend to apply for permission for development at the Headfort Arms Hotel, Headfort Place, Kells, Co. Meath. The development is within the curtilage of a Protected Structure I.A RPS ID 90526 and NIAMH I.D. No. 14313011 listed under Appendix 6, Record of Protected Structures, Meath Development Plan 2021-2027. The development will consist of the removal of existing mono-pitch metal roof structure to function room entrance foyer which also contains existing water storage tanks, to be replaced with an extension comprising two additional floors in a split-level layout to provide 10 no. guest bedrooms each with en-suite facilities. Also, to replace existing water tanks with new to be contained on new roof design, to include for internal and external alterations to existing structure and for connections to public services and all ancillary site works.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Headfort Arms Hotel, Headfort Place, Kells?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →