GrantedDecided 19 April 2024Meath County Council

Manorland (1st Division), Trim, Co. Meath

Planning application 2484
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 April 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The phase 1 stage of development will consist of the erection of a secure boundary perimeter fence with vehicular and pedestrian entrance gates around the site, a 300m 6 lane running track, a 6 lane 100m sprint track, a 500m perimeter running and walking trail, including long jump, high jump, javelin and shot putt facilities with track and field lighting, car parking and set down area, bicycle parking and including connection to existing services where required together with all ancillary site development works. A Stage 1 Screening Report has been submitted with this application

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Manorland (1st Division), Trim, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →