GrantedDecided 30 July 2025Meath County Council

Legar Kinnegad, Co. Meath N91 W102., N91 W102

Planning application 2560280
DecisionConditional grant
Decided30 July 2025
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Permission is sought to retain several existing structures: 1. Permission is sought to retain an existing First floor in an existing dwelling (163.7 sqm). It consists of 2 bedrooms, ensuite bathroom, storage and attic storage. 2. An existing single storey and attic space Garage (62.9 sqm) positioned on the Northeast of the site. 3. An existing structure (139.12 sqm) for the purpose of storage facilities positioned on the Northeast of the site and all associated site works at the above address. Significant further information/revised plans submitted on this application

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Legar Kinnegad, Co. Meath N91 W102., N91 W102?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →