GrantedDecided 08 August 2025Meath County Council

Bridge Street and Bachelors Walk, Ashbourne Killegland, Co. Meath

Planning application 2560600
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 August 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
A.) The demolition of 2 non-habitable dwellings and other derelict structures on the site. b.) The construction of a 4-storey building comprising 2 No. retail units and 1 No. office unit at ground floor level, and 36 apartments including 21 x 1-bed units and 15 x 2-bed units at first, second and third floor levels including private balconies and patios, with some private balconies facing Bridge Street (R135) and Bachelors Walk. c.) Car parking at an undercroft parking area at ground floor level with vehicular access from Bachelors Walk, bin storage, bicycle parking, and communal open space at a landscaped courtyard at first floor level. The development also provides for all associated site development works including alterations to ground levels, lighting and site services

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bridge Street and Bachelors Walk, Ashbourne Killegland, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →