GrantedDecided 23 September 2025Meath County Council

No. 7 The Paddocks, Killeen Castle Demesne Dunsany, Co. Meath

Planning application 2560841
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 September 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Planning permission is sought for development consisting of the construction of a two-storey, detached dwelling and domestic garage, comprising alterations to the design of a previously granted dwelling type A+, being part of a previously permitted residential development of 13 no. two-storey dwellings at ‘The Paddocks’, Killeen Castle Demesne (Previous planning numbers 22/50 and 23/578 relate). The alterations include elevational changes, floor plan layout changes and the linking of the garage to the dwelling with a carport. The application is within the demesne of Killeen Castle, a protected structure (MH 038-100). This application for permission relates to site no. 7, ‘The Paddocks’, Killeen Castle Demesne, Dunsany, Co. Meath and is made on behalf of John Paul Gilroy.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No. 7 The Paddocks, Killeen Castle Demesne Dunsany, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →