GrantedDecided 24 October 2025Meath County Council

Jordanstown, Enfield, Co. Meath

Planning application 2560934
DecisionConditional grant
Decided24 October 2025
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The development will consist of retention permission for the following; (a) change of use of domestic garage to special needs assisted living accommodation. (b) existing fuel / general store shed for ancillary use to main dwelling. (c) garden room with open fronted canopy to the side. The development also includes planning permission for the following: (d) New sensory room to side of assisted living accommodation being retained. (e) Modifications to elevations. (f) Decommissioning existing septic tank and install a new proprietary waste water treatment system and polishing filter. (g) All associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Jordanstown, Enfield, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →