GrantedDecided 03 June 2026Meath County Council

Cruicetown, Kilmainhamwood, Kells Co. Meath

Planning application 2560991
DecisionConditional grant
Decided03 June 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Retention of (1) existing agricultural shed extension incorporating slatted area, underground slurry storage tank, cubicle accommodation, feed and link passages, loose bedded and calf penning areas, (2) agricultural storage shed together with permission to (a) construct agricultural shed to incorporate milking parlour area, dairy, plant room, ancillary storage, drafting / cow dispersal area and external underground slatted washings storage tank, (b) construct extension to existing agricultural slatted shed to incorporate slatted area, underground slurry storage tank, cubicle accommodation and feed apron, (c) construct an agricultural slatted shed to incorporate slatted areas, cubicle accommodation, feed and link passages and underground slurry storage tanks, (d) Complete all ancillary site works and associated site structures

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cruicetown, Kilmainhamwood, Kells Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →