GrantedDecided 21 August 2017Meath County Council

Regents Hall Race Lane, Killegland, Ashbourne Co. Meath

Planning application AA170767
DecisionConditional grant
Decided21 August 2017
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
EXTENSION OF DURATION OF PLANNING PERMISSION DA120225 - the construction of five number three bedroom, 63 number two bedroom and two number one bedroom apartments arranged in five number blocks (2,3 and part 4 storey), demolition of three number existing dwellings, surface car parking, landscaping, site works and relocation of existing ESB substation as amended by a revised public notice received by the planning authority in the 18th day of November 2004 providing for an amended site layout, the addition of a basement car park, revised apartment blocks, revisions to boundary treatment, roads, infrastructure, landscaping proposals and a revised traffic impact assessment, all at lands adjacent to Race Lane and N2, Killegland, Ashbourne, County Meath. The area of the site is circa 0.9 Ha

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Regents Hall Race Lane, Killegland, Ashbourne Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →