RefusedDecided 15 December 2020Meath County Council

Martinstown, Athboy, Co. Meath

Planning application KA201571
DecisionRefused
Decided15 December 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Retention is for a mobile home on site and permission for a new entrance and to remove hedge on the R154 and to be replaced with semi-mature indigenous planting and to be planted 4m back from the road frontage behind a 3m grass verge to accommodate the required 90m sightlines also wayleave access from landowner (marked yellow on site layout map) to access our land also to connect to a BAF sewage treatment system, private well on a previously approved planning application KA/100917 extend by KA/160340 and all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP309230-21Submitted 19 January 2021 / decided 24 May 2021
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Martinstown, Athboy, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →