GrantedDecided 11 March 2020Meath County Council

66 Flowerhill, Navan, Co. Meath

Planning application NA190100
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 March 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Change of use of derelict dwelling house to three one bedroom apartments (one unit to each floor). Permission is also sought to demolish existing rear annex and construct a three storey extension to rear to accommodate access stairs to first and second floors, connect to public sewer, surface water and mains water together with all ancillary works on site at no. 66 Flowerhill, Navan. The above proposed works will be carried out to and within the curtilage of a protected structure ref. no. NT025-101. Significant further information/revised plans submitted on this application

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 66 Flowerhill, Navan, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →