GrantedDecided 08 November 2019Meath County Council

15 Watergate Street, Navan, Co. Meath

Planning application NA191250
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 November 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The development will consist of retention and completion for the following items: Extension to rear of building reconfiguration of proposed North-West elevation (Rear Elevation), alteration to proposed North-East and South-West elevations (Side Elevations). Relocation of 2 no. flagpoles on North-East Elevation (Side Elevation - Abbey Road). Addition of 2 no. flagpoles to South-East (Front Elevation - Watergate Street). Amended signage to South-East (Front Elevation - Watergate Street). Addition of new pedestrian gate on North-East Elevation (Side Elevation - Abbey Road).

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 15 Watergate Street, Navan, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →