GrantedDecided 26 June 2019Meath County Council

23 Fairy House Lodge, Ratoath, Co. Meath

Planning application RA190145
DecisionConditional grant
Decided26 June 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Construction of alterations and amendments to existing elevations and floor plan layouts of existing part two storey/part storey and half type dwelling (2) construction of single storey extension to rear of dwelling to incorporate additional living accommodation (3) construction of storey and a half type porch extension to front elevation (4) construction of dormer windows to rear elevation (5) construction of detached domestic storage shed (6) completion of ancillary site works. Significant further information/revised plans submitted on this application

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 23 Fairy House Lodge, Ratoath, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →