GrantedDecided 04 November 2020Meath County Council

Kilmore, Kilcock, Co. Meath

Planning application RA201256
DecisionConditional grant
Decided04 November 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
The development will consist of (A) The retention of the storey and a half detached garage structure and temporary/time limited permission for continuance of its use as a dwelling. (b) The retention of existing proprietary wastewater treatment unit and polishing filter. (c) Planning permission for the construction of a two storey detached dwelling house, with detached garage/boiler house, vehicular access to be via the existing entrance gateway to the existing family home, new driveway/access road, along with all associated services, service connections, landscape and site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kilmore, Kilcock, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →