GrantedDecided 02 July 2018Monaghan County Council

Hope Castle Gate Lodge No 2, Market Square, Castleblayney

Planning application 188005
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 July 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Monaghan County Council.
Renovate and restore Gate Lodge No 2 (a protected structure) for use as a Branch Library and community space to include the following works: 1. Removal of non original two storey lean-to at rear of building, 2. Construct extension, part single storey and part two storey, with further part basement below to the side and rear of the original building, 3. External works including lighting and signage; and new works linking library to existing car park to the rear with ramps, steps, hard and soft landscaping and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Monaghan has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Hope Castle Gate Lodge No 2, Market Square, Castleblayney?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →