GrantedDecided 02 August 2018Monaghan County Council

Drummaconor, Smithborough, Co. Monaghan

Planning application 1893
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 August 2018
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Monaghan County Council.
Permission to retain (previously granted under register ref: 11/337 for a temporary 5 year period which has expired) for existing 21m high multi-operator telecommunications support structure carrying associated telecommunications equipment, and associated equipment cabinets and cabin within a fenced compound. The development will continue to form part of the existing and future telecommunications and broadband networks. Significant Further Information relates to retention permission for the replacement of 2x0.3m dishes with 2x0.6m dishes and the addition of 6 x RRUs (Remote Radio Units).

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Monaghan has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Drummaconor, Smithborough, Co. Monaghan?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →