GrantedDecided 23 April 2019Monaghan County Council

St. Louis Secondary School, Mullaghmonaghan & Tirkeenan Townlands, Glen Road

Planning application 1993
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 April 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Monaghan County Council.
Permission for a single storey extension to teaching accommodation to the new building which is currently under construction (previously approved Planning Application Ref 17/157) and measures a gross internal floor area of 204m2. The proposal consists of 2no. general classrooms, a science room, prep room and store. The proposal is sited beside the protected structure Teach Iosef in the school grounds. The application includes flood risk assessment which was carried out for the previous application.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Monaghan has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near St. Louis Secondary School, Mullaghmonaghan & Tirkeenan Townlands, Glen Road?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →