RefusedDecided 21 July 2021Monaghan County Council

Eir Exchange, Main Street, Glaslough

Planning application 21296
DecisionRefused
Decided21 July 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Monaghan County Council.
Permission for a development consisting of an existing 10m monopole and associated equipment (13m overall height) and installation of a replacement 18m monopole (19.5m overall height) along with the installation of antennae, a dish, equipment cabinets, cable ladders, fencing and ancillary development thereto for enhanced wireless data and broadband services. ***An Bord Pleanala’s decision was subject to Judicial Review. Board Order decision was quashed by the High Court dated 15th December 2023 with no remittal.***

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-311154-21Submitted 17 August 2021 / decided 24 March 2022
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Monaghan has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eir Exchange, Main Street, Glaslough?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →